Jonathan Matkowsky

Threat-intel-backed investigation and domain takeover proceedings

Decades of experience spanning internationally recognized law firms, in-house legal teams, and elite cyber threat-intelligence teams.

I bring that experience together to investigate and disrupt malicious infrastructure, use legal process to pursue attribution, and where appropriate, make criminal referrals aimed at stopping threat actors from targeting or retargeting your organization.

Let’s explore together what makes practical sense for your organization.

Can multiple domain names or different registrants be handled in one UDRP complaint?

Multiple disputed domains can be included in one UDRP complaint when the procedural requirements are satisfied. When the domains are registered to nominally different respondents, consolidation is fact-dependent: panels look for evidence that the domains or corresponding websites are subject to common control and whether consolidation would be fair and procedurally efficient.

Common-control evidence can come from combinations of registration data, historical WHOIS, IP and hosting relationships, nameservers, email addresses, phone and address artifacts, redirects, site templates, analytics identifiers, timing, and other recurring technical or operational fingerprints. No single signal is automatically decisive.

In a 2016 dispute brought by F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG (WIPO D2016-0517), the panel found common ownership or control more likely than not across 11 adjudicated domains. The decision is cited in WIPO Overview 3.0 and 3.1 section 4.11.2 on consolidation against multiple respondents.

Sources: WIPO Overview 3.1

AI can make mistakes. By using this site, you hereby agree to the Terms and Privacy Notice.