Jonathan Matkowsky

Threat-intel-backed investigation and domain takeover proceedings

Decades of experience spanning internationally recognized law firms, in-house legal teams, and elite cyber threat-intelligence teams.

I bring that experience together to investigate and disrupt malicious infrastructure, use legal process to pursue attribution, and where appropriate, make criminal referrals aimed at stopping threat actors from targeting or retargeting your organization.

Let’s explore together what makes practical sense for your organization.

How can threat intelligence and infrastructure investigation support litigation?

Threat intelligence can help a litigation team understand the technical facts behind an online-abuse or infrastructure dispute: which assets are related, what identities or providers appear in the chain, what evidence is volatile, and which attribution claims are supported versus still hypothetical.

That analysis can help counsel identify records that may matter, preserve technical evidence, organize a chronology, test common-control or attribution hypotheses, and determine where lawful discovery or other legal process may add information. Technical findings do not substitute for the legal elements of a claim or the applicable evidentiary rules; they provide a better factual map for legal decision-making.

Jonathan’s background spans litigation, Internet and technology matters, threat intelligence, infrastructure attribution, and domain proceedings. That combination can be useful when a matter requires security analysts and litigation counsel to work from the same evidentiary record.

AI can make mistakes.

By submitting a question to the AI, you thereby agree to the Terms and Privacy Notice.