Jonathan Matkowsky

Threat-intel-backed investigation and domain takeover proceedings

Decades of experience spanning internationally recognized law firms, in-house legal teams, and elite cyber threat-intelligence teams.

I bring that experience together to investigate and disrupt malicious infrastructure, use legal process to pursue attribution, and where appropriate, make criminal referrals aimed at stopping threat actors from targeting or retargeting your organization.

Let’s explore together what makes practical sense for your organization.

How can Jonathan advise security and legal leaders on cyber enforcement decisions?

Some investigations create decisions that do not belong to one function alone: whether to continue collecting or act, whether to use a provider or legal pathway, how much attribution confidence is enough for a particular step, whether to make a referral, and whether the capability should be built internally or supported externally.

Jonathan can help security, threat-intelligence, investigations, legal, and executive stakeholders work from a common factual record and compare the operational and legal consequences of the available paths. The discipline is to separate verified facts from hypotheses, identify the evidence each option requires, and make the tradeoffs explicit.

That advisory role does not replace the organization’s CISO, internal legal team, incident-response provider, or business leadership. It is most useful when a technical investigation has reached a cross-functional decision point and the organization needs the security and legal workflows to connect.

AI can make mistakes.

By submitting a question to the AI, you thereby agree to the Terms and Privacy Notice.